Sexual coercion in dating relationships journal of psychology human sexuality

These, then, are assumed to guard against sexual coercion.The purpose of this study was to determine if female athletes were at a lower risk for sexual coercion and whether differences existed in levels of assertiveness, sexual assertiveness, self-esteem, sexual esteem, alcohol use, and the number of sexual partners.Researchers have attempted to broaden their understanding of womens use of initiation tactics and specifically the use of aggressive tactics by considering the role of cultural norms and expectations, and the psychological characteristics of individuals that promote differences in aggressive and nonaggressive initiation tactics (Anderson & Sorenson, 1999; Anderson & Aymami, 1993; OSullivan & Byers, 1993).

The purpose of this study was to examine possible predictors of the use of three conceptually distinct sets of sexual initiation tactics: seduction, coercion, and force."Bystander programs engage men and women not (primarily) as potential perpetrators or victims, but rather as potential bystanders to situations involving sexual or intimate partner violence.Bystander prevention programs presume that all members of the community have a role in shifting norms to prevent violence....Visit The EAAA program is based on feminist and social psychological theory, most notably Nurius and Norris’s (1996) cognitive ecological model of women’s responses to sexual coercion as well as reviews of research evidence (i.e., by Rozee and Koss (2011) and Ullman (1997) on the most effective strategies for resisting sexual assault).The fourth unit dealing with positive sexuality is adapted from the Our Whole Lives Sexuality (OWLS) education curricula (Kimball, 2000). cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience.

You must have an account to comment. Please register or login here!